Pilling Report

Living in Love and Faith: A Guide for Members of General Synod

Living in Love and Faith: A Guide for Members of General Synod

The Living in Love and Faith process has evolved from the 1998 Lambeth Conference resolution 1.10 that committed the church “to listen to the experience of homosexual persons”, via, in July 2011, the House of Bishops review of its 2005 Pastoral Statement on civil partnerships. From this they set up a Working Group on Human Sexuality chaired by Sir Joseph Pilling resulting in the ‘Pilling Report’ that proposed the Shared Conversations. The outcome of 23 years of an evolving process is a report to General Synod that is no longer focused on listening to us, or on civil partnerships, or even on a radical new Christian inclusion for LGBTIQ+ people, but listening to our lament, fear and pain. Changing Attitude is determined to ensure they hear our anger, frustration, and determination to achieve justice and equality for LGBTIQ+ people within God’s unconditional love manifest in Jesus the Christ.

LGBTI+ and Church of England Teaching Documents – a history

LGBTI+ and Church of England Teaching Documents – a history

I wrote this document in July 2018 before the proposed teaching document had been renamed Living in Love and Faith. I have made minor amendments but otherwise left it unchanged. I wrote this history of the teaching documents published by the Church of England to demonstrate to myself why I was feeling so angry in 2018. I was angry because, following Pilling and the Shared Conversations, a further delay of three years was being engineered by the House of Bishops who still lacked the guts to confront the human sexuality of LGBTI+ people and the need to radically include us as equals in the Church.

Traditional or Revisionist – LGBTI+ Anglicans and the Teaching Document – a history

Traditional or Revisionist – LGBTI+ Anglicans and the Teaching Document – a history

Is the House of Bishops ready to make evolutionary and revolutionary choices about the direction in which the Church of England’s teachings about gender and sexuality will evolve? The key question about the Teaching Document for LGBTI+ members of the Church of England is: will this report achieve the radical change we now urgently need, both we who identify as LGBTI and the majority in the church for whom current teaching and practice is no longer adequate or believable?

Three wasted, humiliating years

Three wasted, humiliating years

Why are LGBTI Anglicans so angry about the report from the House of Bishops: Marriage and Same Sex Relationships after the Shared Conversations? A comment made four years ago by someone involved in the development of Pilling’s work struck me. “The Pilling group was an ill-conceived exercise in the first place, ill-conceived in part because formulated by a male only group initially. It was marked by a lack of coherence and incompetence in the Church.” If that was a considered assessment of the value of the Pilling group prior to the Shared Conversations, we should not be surprised that the final outcome has the marks of ill-conceived incompetence. The anger felt by LGBGTI Anglicans about the latest report should come as no surprise. The report comes from the same stable of bishops.